[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176055121712.1529254.17045515819433949532.b4-ty@google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:02:38 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] KVM: replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to
alloc_workqueue() users
On Fri, 05 Sep 2025 11:11:38 +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Below is a summary of a discussion about the Workqueue API and cpu isolation
> considerations. Details and more information are available here:
>
> "workqueue: Always use wq_select_unbound_cpu() for WORK_CPU_UNBOUND."
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
>
> === Current situation: problems ===
>
> [...]
Applied to kvm-x86 generic, with a rewritten changelog to tailor it to KVM.
Thanks!
[1/1] KVM: Explicitly allocate/setup irqfd cleanup as per-CPU workqueue
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/9259607ec710
--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists