lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176055119471.1528900.16047808072294975428.b4-ty@google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:02:50 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, 
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Don't fall over when only one CPU

On Tue, 07 Oct 2025 19:12:31 +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Running this test on a system with only one CPU is not a recipe for
> success. However, there's no clear-cut reason why it absolutely
> shouldn't work, so the test shouldn't completely reject such a platform.
> 
> At present, the *3/4 calculation will return zero on these platforms and
> the test fails. So, instead just skip that calculation.
> 
> [...]

Applied to kvm-x86 selftests, thanks!

[1/1] KVM: selftests: Don't fall over when only one CPU
      https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/98dea1b75186

--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ