linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 4/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pre-allocate a per-master invalidation array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fdbc981f7fd757be50b34e5631d9bbb9e0c98513.1760555863.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:42:49 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: <will@...nel.org>, <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: <jean-philippe@...aro.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
	<balbirs@...dia.com>, <miko.lenczewski@....com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<kevin.tian@...el.com>, <praan@...gle.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pre-allocate a per-master invalidation array

When a master is attached from an old domain to a new domain, it needs to
build an invalidation array to delete and add the array entries from/onto
the invalidation arrays of those two domains, passed via the to_merge and
to_unref arguments into arm_smmu_invs_merge/unref() respectively.

Since the master->num_streams might differ across masters, a memory would
have to be allocated when building an to_merge/to_unref array which might
fail with -ENOMEM.

On the other hand, an attachment to arm_smmu_blocked_domain must not fail
so it's the best to avoid any memory allocation in that path.

Pre-allocate a fixed size invalidation array for every master. This array
will be used as a scratch to fill dynamically when building a to_merge or
to_unref invs array. Sort fwspec->ids in an ascending order to fit to the
arm_smmu_invs_merge() function.

Co-developed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |  8 ++++++
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
index d079c66a41e94..c43b2ffef8a4d 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -930,6 +930,14 @@ struct arm_smmu_master {
 	struct arm_smmu_device		*smmu;
 	struct device			*dev;
 	struct arm_smmu_stream		*streams;
+	/*
+	 * Scratch memory for a to_merge or to_unref array to build a per-domain
+	 * invalidation array. It'll be pre-allocated with enough enries for all
+	 * possible build scenarios. It can be used by only one caller at a time
+	 * until the arm_smmu_invs_merge/unref() finishes. Must be locked by the
+	 * iommu_group mutex.
+	 */
+	struct arm_smmu_invs		*build_invs;
 	struct arm_smmu_vmaster		*vmaster; /* use smmu->streams_mutex */
 	/* Locked by the iommu core using the group mutex */
 	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg	cd_table;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 2a8a0c76af67b..97f52130992cd 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -3687,12 +3687,22 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_sid_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int arm_smmu_ids_cmp(const void *_l, const void *_r)
+{
+	const typeof_member(struct iommu_fwspec, ids[0]) *l = _l;
+	const typeof_member(struct iommu_fwspec, ids[0]) *r = _r;
+
+	return cmp_int(*l, *r);
+}
+
 static int arm_smmu_insert_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 				  struct arm_smmu_master *master)
 {
 	int i;
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(master->dev);
+	bool ats_supported = dev_is_pci(master->dev) &&
+			     pci_ats_supported(to_pci_dev(master->dev));
 
 	master->streams = kcalloc(fwspec->num_ids, sizeof(*master->streams),
 				  GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -3700,6 +3710,21 @@ static int arm_smmu_insert_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	master->num_streams = fwspec->num_ids;
 
+	if (!ats_supported) {
+		/* Base case has 1 ASID entry or maximum 2 VMID entries */
+		master->build_invs = arm_smmu_invs_alloc(2);
+	} else {
+		/* Put the ids into order for sorted to_merge/to_unref arrays */
+		sort_nonatomic(fwspec->ids, fwspec->num_ids,
+			       sizeof(fwspec->ids[0]), arm_smmu_ids_cmp, NULL);
+		/* ATS case adds num_ids of entries, on top of the base case */
+		master->build_invs = arm_smmu_invs_alloc(2 + fwspec->num_ids);
+	}
+	if (IS_ERR(master->build_invs)) {
+		kfree(master->streams);
+		return PTR_ERR(master->build_invs);
+	}
+
 	mutex_lock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
 	for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
 		struct arm_smmu_stream *new_stream = &master->streams[i];
@@ -3737,6 +3762,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_insert_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 		for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
 			rb_erase(&master->streams[i].node, &smmu->streams);
 		kfree(master->streams);
+		kfree(master->build_invs);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
 
@@ -3758,6 +3784,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_master(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
 	mutex_unlock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
 
 	kfree(master->streams);
+	kfree(master->build_invs);
 }
 
 static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
-- 
2.43.0