[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aO_67_pJD71FBLmd@t14s.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:50:07 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Alexey Simakov <bigalex934@...il.com>
Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: avoid NULL dereference when chunk data buffer
is missing
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 09:45:10PM +0300, Alexey Simakov wrote:
> chunk->skb pointer is dereferenced in the if-block where it's supposed
> to be NULL only.
The issue is well spotted. More below.
>
> Use the chunk header instead, which should be available at this point
> in execution.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Fixes: 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support")
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Simakov <bigalex934@...il.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/inqueue.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/inqueue.c b/net/sctp/inqueue.c
> index 5c1652181805..f1830c21953f 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/inqueue.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/inqueue.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,8 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_inq_pop(struct sctp_inq *queue)
With more context here:
if ((skb_shinfo(chunk->skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_SCTP) == SKB_GSO_SCTP) {
/* GSO-marked skbs but without frags, handle
* them normally
*/
if (skb_shinfo(chunk->skb)->frag_list)
chunk->head_skb = chunk->skb;
/* skbs with "cover letter" */
if (chunk->head_skb && chunk->skb->data_len == chunk->skb->len)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
chunk->head_skb would also not be guaranteed.
> chunk->skb = skb_shinfo(chunk->skb)->frag_list;
But chunk->skb can only be NULL if chunk->head_skb is not, then.
Thing is, we cannot replace chunk->skb here then, because otherwise
when freeing this chunk in sctp_chunk_free below it will not reference
chunk->head_skb and will cause a leak.
With that, the check below should be done just before replacing
chunk->skb right above, inside the if() block. We're sure that
otherwise chunk->skb is non-NULL because of outer if() condition.
Thanks,
Marcelo
>
> if (WARN_ON(!chunk->skb)) {
> - __SCTP_INC_STATS(dev_net(chunk->skb->dev), SCTP_MIB_IN_PKT_DISCARDS);
> + __SCTP_INC_STATS(dev_net(chunk->head_skb->dev),
> + SCTP_MIB_IN_PKT_DISCARDS);
> sctp_chunk_free(chunk);
> goto next_chunk;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists