[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTtA3PyEnscQx+JtM3wBb0YZJxFjoJp4JB6QJQXbN6q3HVFyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:54:39 -0500
From: Andy Chiu <andybnac@...il.com>
To: Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@...il.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>, Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>, Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>,
Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>, Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] riscv: vector: initialize vlenb on the first
context switch
Hi Sergey,
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 6:58 AM Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The vstate in thread_struct is zeroed when the vector context is
> initialized. That includes read-only register vlenb, which holds
> the vector register length in bytes. This zeroed state persists
> until mstatus.VS becomes 'dirty' and a context switch saves the
> actual hardware values.
>
> This can expose the zero vlenb value to the user-space in early
> debug scenarios, e.g. when ptrace attaches to a traced process
> early, before any vector instruction except the first one was
> executed.
>
> Fix this by forcing the vector context save on the first context switch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c
> index 901e67adf576..3dd22a71aa18 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c
> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ static int riscv_v_thread_zalloc(struct kmem_cache *cache,
>
> ctx->datap = datap;
> memset(ctx, 0, offsetof(struct __riscv_v_ext_state, datap));
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -216,8 +217,11 @@ bool riscv_v_first_use_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> force_sig(SIGBUS);
> return true;
> }
> +
> riscv_v_vstate_on(regs);
> riscv_v_vstate_set_restore(current, regs);
> + set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_RISCV_V_FORCE_SAVE);
> +
I am afraid that this approach can result in a security issue where a
context switch happens before the v-restore part of the current
process, cheating the kernel to store stale v-regs onto the current
context memory. Please note that this handler is run with irq enabled
so preemption is allowed.
I would expect simply initializing the vleb in riscv_v_thread_zalloc,
perhaps dropping the "z" in the name to prevent confusion.
> return true;
> }
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
Thanks,
Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists