[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPAFWuJCfvTcK8hz@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:34:34 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] ARM: dts: imx6: rename touch-thermal0 to
touch-0-thermal
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 09:00:15PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 12:44:27PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > - touch-thermal0 {
> > + touch0-thermal {
> ...
> > - touch-thermal1 {
> > + touch1-thermal {
> ...
> > - touch-thermal0 {
> > + touch-0-thermal {
> ...
> > - touch-thermal1 {
> > + touch-1-thermal {
> ...
> > - touch-thermal0 {
> > + touch-0-thermal {
> ...
> > - touch-thermal1 {
> > + touch-1-thermal {
>
> Is it touch-N-thermal or touchN-thermal?
What's difference? I suppose both naming should be okay.
Frank
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists