[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aO8TKQN6ifOSMRSC@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 04:21:13 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
"zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
"T . J . Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steve.kang@...soc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] driver: dma-buf: use alloc_pages_bulk_list for
order-0 allocation
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 09:12:07AM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> > Could be that we need to make this behavior conditional, but somebody would need to come up with some really good arguments to justify the complexity.
> ok, should we use CONFIG_DMA_BUF_BULK_ALLOCATION or a variable
> controlled by sysfs interface?
No. Explain what you're trying to solve, because you haven't yet.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists