[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251016145801.47552-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 22:57:59 +0800
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org,
andrii@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
memxor@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-patches-bot@...com,
Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 1/3] bpf: Fix possible memleak in [lru_,]percpu_hash map update
As [lru_,]percpu_hash maps support BPF_KPTR_{REF,PERCPU}, missing
calls to 'bpf_obj_free_fields()' in 'pcpu_copy_value()' can leak memory
referenced by BPF_KPTR_{REF,PERCPU} fields.
Fix this by calling 'bpf_obj_free_fields()' after
'copy_map_value[,_long]()' in 'pcpu_copy_value()'.
Fixes: 65334e64a493 ("bpf: Support kptrs in percpu hashmap and percpu LRU hashmap")
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index c2fcd0cd51e51..26308adc9ccb3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -950,12 +950,14 @@ static void pcpu_copy_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, void __percpu *pptr,
if (!onallcpus) {
/* copy true value_size bytes */
copy_map_value(&htab->map, this_cpu_ptr(pptr), value);
+ bpf_obj_free_fields(htab->map.record, this_cpu_ptr(pptr));
} else {
u32 size = round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
int off = 0, cpu;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off);
+ bpf_obj_free_fields(htab->map.record, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
off += size;
}
}
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists