lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPENUdGUywB88-LD@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 17:20:49 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
	Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@...rfivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:irq/drivers 11/18] drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c:419:16:
 error: implicit declaration of function 'imx_mu_probe'; did you mean
 'imx_mu_write'?

On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 05:16:21PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 10:47:56PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git irq/drivers
> > head:   45f8fdcfbf4e49075172cf1a3fd812b90160e903
> > commit: 4265aed28d7de2a643b8e441bc25344f421f2f78 [11/18] irqchip: Pass platform device to platform drivers

> >    drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c: In function 'imx_mu_imx7ulp_probe':
> > >> drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c:419:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'imx_mu_probe'; did you mean 'imx_mu_write'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> >      419 |         return imx_mu_probe(pdev, parent, &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp);
> >          |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> >          |                imx_mu_write
> >    drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c: At top level:
> > >> drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c:299:12: warning: 'imx_mu_of_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >      299 | static int imx_mu_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct device_node *parent,
> >          |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Thomas, this looks like a bad edit on your part where you renamed
> imx_mu_probe() back to imx_mu_init() when you removed a line break from
> the function header.

Actually the line break is still there, but the function has its old
name in your tree for some reason.

Johan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ