[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251016180108.GO3938986@ziepe.ca>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:01:08 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
Cc: Sean Hefty <shefty@...dia.com>, Jacob Moroni <jmoroni@...gle.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Vlad Dumitrescu <vdumitrescu@...dia.com>,
Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@...dia.com>,
Manjunath Patil <manjunath.b.patil@...cle.com>,
OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/cm: Rate limit destroy CM ID timeout error
message
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 04:43:16PM +0000, Haakon Bugge wrote:
> Well, I started off this thread thinking a cm_deref_id() was missing
> somewhere, but now I am more inclined to think as you do, this is an
> unrecoverable situation, and I should work with NVIDIA to fix it.
If the VF is just stuck and not progressing QPs for whatever reason
then yes absolutely.
At best all we can do is detect stuck QPs and try to recover them as I
described.
How hard/costly would it be to have a tx timer watchdog on the mad
layer send q?
At the very least we could log a stuck MAD QP..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists