[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4f5ca12-bf67-4b48-97a1-7ab2c771056e@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 12:39:31 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org" <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>, Alistair Popple
<apopple@...dia.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
"bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com" <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Timur Tabi <ttabi@...dia.com>,
"joel@...lfernandes.org" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Elle Rhumsaa <elle@...thered-steel.dev>,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
"nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Edwin Peer <epeer@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7.1 2/4] gpu: nova-core: bitfield: Move bitfield-specific
code from register! into new macro
On 10/16/25 12:34 PM, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Thu Oct 16, 2025 at 9:28 PM CEST, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> On Oct 16, 2025, at 1:48 PM, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 11:13:21AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
...
> While I'm not super opinionated for general bitfields, for the register!()
> infrastructure I very much prefer the hi:lo notation, as this is the common
> notation in datasheets and TRMs.
>
> However, if we use hi:lo, we should use it decending, i.e.:
>
Sure, descending works.
> bitfield! {
> struct ControlReg {
> 7:5 state as u8 => State;
> 3:0 mode as u8 ?=> Mode;
And hi:lo matches our HW reference manuals. And if you're dealing
with bitfields, you are often also dealing with HW, so this is
a reasonable place in the SW to use hi:lo.
Looks good to me.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists