lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FEAD8998-7D22-47A7-B852-26D70D991C93@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 19:47:21 +0000
From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
CC: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org"
	<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "dakr@...nel.org" <dakr@...nel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>, Alistair Popple
	<apopple@...dia.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor
	<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo
	<gary@...yguo.net>, "bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com" <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, David
 Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Maarten
 Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard
	<mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Timur Tabi
	<ttabi@...dia.com>, "joel@...lfernandes.org" <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Elle
 Rhumsaa <elle@...thered-steel.dev>, Daniel Almeida
	<daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, "nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org"
	<nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Edwin Peer <epeer@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7.1 2/4] gpu: nova-core: bitfield: Move bitfield-specific
 code from register! into new macro



> On Oct 16, 2025, at 3:42 PM, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> wrote:
> 
> In this case, most or even all of these can stay under 100 lines, I suspect.

Sure, 100 line limit sounds reasonable. It was not clear what limit Yury
was referring to (ex, 80 lines).

I will revise it.  Thanks,

 - Joel


> 
>> why it is a checkpatch warning not an error. We have to look it case by case.
>> 
> 
> 
> thanks,
> --
> John Hubbard
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ