[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251016125951.27bb194ab31fe5c61f657a71@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 12:59:51 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>, Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, DMML <dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] dm-ebs: Mark full buffer dirty even on partial
write
On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 16:47:31 +0200 "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com> wrote:
> When performing a read-modify-write(RMW) operation, any modification
> to a buffered block must cause the entire buffer to be marked dirty.
>
> Marking only a subrange as dirty is incorrect because the underlying
> device block size(ubs) defines the minimum read/write granularity. A
> lower device can perform I/O only on regions which are fully aligned
> and sized to ubs.
>
> This change ensures that write-back operations always occur in full
> ubs-sized chunks, matching the intended emulation semantics of the
> EBS target.
It sounds like this can result in corruption under some circumstances?
It would be helpful if you could spell this out clearly, please. What
are the userspace-visible effects of this bug and how are those effects
demonstrated?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists