lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251016235538.171962-1-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 16:55:38 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, 
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: KVM: Formalizing taking vcpu->mutex *outside*
 of kvm->slots_lock

Explicitly document the ordering of vcpu->mutex being taken *outside* of
kvm->slots_lock.  While extremely unintuitive, and arguably wrong, both
arm64 and x86 have gained flows that take kvm->slots_lock inside of
vcpu->mutex.  x86's kvm_inhibit_apic_access_page() is particularly
nasty, as slots_lock is taken quite deep within KVM_RUN, i.e. simply
swapping the ordering isn't an option.

Commit to the vcpu->mutex => kvm->slots_lock ordering even though taking a
VM-scoped lock inside a vCPU-scoped lock is odd, as vcpu->mutex really is
intended to be a "top-level" lock in most respects, whereas kvm->slots_lock
is "just" a helper lock.

Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst
index ae8bce7fecbe..2b4c786038be 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ The acquisition orders for mutexes are as follows:
 
 - kvm->lock is taken outside kvm->slots_lock and kvm->irq_lock
 
+- vcpu->mutex is taken outside kvm->slots_lock
+
 - kvm->slots_lock is taken outside kvm->irq_lock, though acquiring
   them together is quite rare.
 

base-commit: 6b36119b94d0b2bb8cea9d512017efafd461d6ac
-- 
2.51.0.858.gf9c4a03a3a-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ