[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f564735b-7cbd-486c-9dd4-a4555e73edde@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 13:17:07 +0200
From: Loïc Molinari <loic.molinari@...labora.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin
<tursulin@...ulin.net>, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>, Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>,
Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Mikołaj Wasiak
<mikolaj.wasiak@...el.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@...el.com>, Andi Shyti
<andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Christopher Healy <healych@...zon.com>, Bagas Sanjaya
<bagasdotme@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/13] drm/shmem-helper: Map huge pages in fault
handlers
Hi Matthew,
On 15/10/2025 19:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 05:30:07PM +0200, Loïc Molinari wrote:
>
> This looks fine, no need to resend to fix this, but if you'd written
> the previous patch slightly differently, you'd've reduced the amount of
> code you moved around in this patch, which would have made it easier to
> review.
>
>> + /* Map a range of pages around the faulty address. */
>> + do {
>> + pfn = page_to_pfn(pages[start_pgoff]);
>> + ret = vmf_insert_pfn(vma, addr, pfn);
>> + addr += PAGE_SIZE;
>> + } while (++start_pgoff <= end_pgoff && ret == VM_FAULT_NOPAGE);
>
> It looks to me like we have an opportunity to do better here by
> adding a vmf_insert_pfns() interface. I don't think we should delay
> your patch series to add it, but let's not forget to do that; it can
> have very good performnce effects on ARM to use contptes.
Agreed. I initially wanted to provide such an interface based on
set_ptes() to benefit from arm64 contptes but thought it'd better be a
distinct patch series.
>
>> @@ -617,8 +645,9 @@ static vm_fault_t drm_gem_shmem_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> [...]
>>
>> - ret = vmf_insert_pfn(vma, vmf->address, page_to_pfn(page));
>> + if (drm_gem_shmem_map_pmd(vmf, vmf->address, pages[page_offset])) {
>> + ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
>> + goto out;
>> }
>
> Does this actually work?
Yes, it does. Huge pages are successfully mapped from both map_pages and
fault handlers. Anything wrong with it?
There seems to be an another issue thought. There are failures [1], all
looking like that one [2]. I think it's because map_pages is called with
the RCU read lock taken and the DRM GEM map_pages handler must lock the
GEM object before accessing pages with dma_resv_lock(). The locking doc
says: "If it's not possible to reach a page without blocking, filesystem
should skip it.". Unlocking the RCU read lock in the handler seems wrong
and doing without a map_pages implementation would be unfortunate. What
would you recommend here?
Loïc
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/156001/
[2]
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_156001v1/bat-dg1-7/igt@vgem_basic@dmabuf-mmap.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists