linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/vmalloc: request large order pages from buddy allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aPDcqeHUj5xJEbV4@milan>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 13:53:13 +0200
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
	"Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@...il.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/vmalloc: request large order pages from buddy
 allocator

On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 11:57:56PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 03:42:50PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > Agree. We do not want BUG_ON() in split_page(). I think it is better to
> > control this even though nobody invokes vmalloc() with __GFP_COMP.
> 
> Please explicitly warn and reject vmalloc calls with unsupported
> flag.  The fact that many flags get silently ignored or dropped or
> could lead to behavior in gfp_t based interfaces is a constant source
> of problems.
> 
Thank you for input.

--
Uladzislau Rezki