[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <564165ba-38ae-4c86-a980-b2342aa20695@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:23:12 +0530
From: Nihal Kumar Gupta <quic_nihalkum@...cinc.com>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Vikram Sharma
<quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>,
<bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, <mchehab@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
<cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<will@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <quic_svankada@...cinc.com>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ravi Shankar
<quic_rshankar@...cinc.com>,
Vishal Verma <quic_vishverm@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-evk-camera: Add DT
overlay
On 16-10-2025 00:45, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> configuration. Introducing a device tree overlay to support optional
>
> s/Introducing/Introduce
>
ACK
>> Co-developed-by: Ravi Shankar <quic_rshankar@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Shankar <quic_rshankar@...cinc.com>
>
> The first expected Signed-off-by tag shall be from the change author, and
> it is not.
ACK
>> + * Copyright (c) Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries.
>
> Year is missing.
>
This is as per new yearless copyright format.
>> + avdd-supply = <&vreg_cam1_2p8>;
>> +
>
> Please remove empty lines between individual properties.
>
ACK
> Remove 'clock-lanes' property, first of all it is non-configurable,
> and definitely it's hypothetical value can not be equal to '7'.
ACK
>> + };
>
> I'd suggest to add a description of pins with MCLK function in a separate
> change to the SoC specific .dtsi file. It will cover gpio67, gpio68, gpio74
> and gpio69, so here it's a MCLK1 pin for instance.
We are currently enabling sensor only on CCI1. Pins gpio67–gpio69 are used by mclk for cam0–cam2, and gpio74 enables the regulator.
Since mclk is sensor-specific, it's added in the sensor dtso.
Would it be appropriate to extend mclk support to all CCI instances, even if some are not actively used?
@Konrad, @Bryan, Could you please share your thoughts on the above?
If valid, then cam0_default, cam1_default, cam2_default should be added in SoC dtsi, with references used in sensor dtso.
>
>> +
>> + ldo-avdd-pins {
--
Regards,
Nihal Kumar Gupta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists