linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] irqchip/plic: add support for UltraRISC DP1000 PLIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87plalzmg4.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 15:28:59 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@...hat.com>
Cc: alex@...ti.fr, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, cmirabil@...hat.com,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dramforever@...e.com,
 krzk+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, lzampier@...hat.com, palmer@...belt.com,
 paul.walmsley@...ive.com, robh@...nel.org, samuel.holland@...ive.com,
 zhangxincheng@...rarisc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] irqchip/plic: add support for UltraRISC DP1000 PLIC

On Thu, Oct 16 2025 at 15:58, Charles Mirabile wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 07:53:26PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> What do you think about the attached patch (it should be not corrupt :^)
> I think I adressed your concerns, and I ran it through clang-format too.
>
> I folded everything into one diff for ease of review, but when we send it
> officially there will be a separate patch for the caching refactor.

Looks about right and it's a net win for everyone due to the suspend
path cleanup.