[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74272098-cfb7-424b-a55e-55e94f04524e@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 17:20:55 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, balbirs@...dia.com
Cc: Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, airlied@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
apopple@...dia.com, baohua@...nel.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
byungchul@...com, dakr@...nel.org, dev.jain@....com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, francois.dugast@...el.com,
gourry@...rry.net, joshua.hahnjy@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, lyude@...hat.com, matthew.brost@...el.com,
mpenttil@...hat.com, npache@...hat.com, osalvador@...e.de,
rakie.kim@...com, rcampbell@...dia.com, ryan.roberts@....com,
simona@...ll.ch, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com, ziy@...dia.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: KVM/s390x regression
Am 17.10.25 um 17:07 schrieb David Hildenbrand:
> On 17.10.25 17:01, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Am 17.10.25 um 16:54 schrieb David Hildenbrand:
>>> On 17.10.25 16:49, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>> This patch triggers a regression for s390x kvm as qemu guests can no longer start
>>>>
>>>> error: kvm run failed Cannot allocate memory
>>>> PSW=mask 0000000180000000 addr 000000007fd00600
>>>> R00=0000000000000000 R01=0000000000000000 R02=0000000000000000 R03=0000000000000000
>>>> R04=0000000000000000 R05=0000000000000000 R06=0000000000000000 R07=0000000000000000
>>>> R08=0000000000000000 R09=0000000000000000 R10=0000000000000000 R11=0000000000000000
>>>> R12=0000000000000000 R13=0000000000000000 R14=0000000000000000 R15=0000000000000000
>>>> C00=00000000000000e0 C01=0000000000000000 C02=0000000000000000 C03=0000000000000000
>>>> C04=0000000000000000 C05=0000000000000000 C06=0000000000000000 C07=0000000000000000
>>>> C08=0000000000000000 C09=0000000000000000 C10=0000000000000000 C11=0000000000000000
>>>> C12=0000000000000000 C13=0000000000000000 C14=00000000c2000000 C15=0000000000000000
>>>>
>>>> KVM on s390x does not use THP so far, will investigate. Does anyone have a quick idea?
>>>
>>> Only when running KVM guests and apart from that everything else seems to be fine?
>>
>> We have other weirdness in linux-next but in different areas. Could that somehow be
>> related to use disabling THP for the kvm address space?
>
> Not sure ... it's a bit weird. I mean, when KVM disables THPs we essentially just remap everything to be mapped by PTEs. So there shouldn't be any PMDs in that whole process.
>
> Remapping a file THP (shmem) implies zapping the THP completely.
>
>
> I assume in your kernel config has CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE and CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION set, right?
yes.
>
> I'd rule out copy_huge_pmd(), zap_huge_pmd() a well.
>
>
> What happens if you revert the change in mm/pgtable-generic.c?
That partial revert seems to fix the issue
diff --git a/mm/pgtable-generic.c b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
index 0c847cdf4fd3..567e2d084071 100644
--- a/mm/pgtable-generic.c
+++ b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ pte_t *___pte_offset_map(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdvalp)
if (pmdvalp)
*pmdvalp = pmdval;
- if (unlikely(pmd_none(pmdval) || !pmd_present(pmdval)))
+ if (unlikely(pmd_none(pmdval) || is_pmd_migration_entry(pmdval)))
goto nomap;
if (unlikely(pmd_trans_huge(pmdval)))
goto nomap;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists