linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] can: netlink: add CAN XL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251017-enchanted-quiet-civet-84dd47-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 18:34:21 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@...nel.org>
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>, 
	Stéphane Grosjean <stephane.grosjean@...-networks.com>, Robert Nawrath <mbro1689@...il.com>, 
	Minh Le <minh.le.aj@...esas.com>, Duy Nguyen <duy.nguyen.rh@...esas.com>, 
	linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] can: netlink: add CAN XL

On 18.10.2025 01:20:31, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> >>> What about merging patches 1+2 now?
> >>
> >> If patch 1 had to be squashed,
> > 
> > Sorry - I was offering you to take patches 1+2 into can-next-testing
> > now.
> 
> Ah! This makes more sense. Sorry for misreading you.
> 
> Yes, you can pick those two. But could you just push your
> can-next-testing branch to git.kernel.org after picking those? This
> way, I can rebase my series on top of it instead of dealing with some
> complex dependencies.

Right, taking only part of the series makes things more complicated.
Better keep them for now.

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)