[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPHibioUFZV8Wnd1@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 23:30:06 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] PCI/P2PDMA: Separate the mmap() support from the
core logic
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 06:26:03PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> The DMA API now has a new flow, and has gained phys_addr_t support, so
> it no longer needs struct pages to perform P2P mapping.
That's news to me. All the pci_p2pdma_map_state machinery is still
based on pgmaps and thus pages.
> Lifecycle management can be delegated to the user, DMABUF for instance
> has a suitable invalidation protocol that does not require struct page.
How?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists