[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7bbb7dd-ddc6-43d6-b234-53213bde71bd@altera.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 13:06:34 +0530
From: "G Thomas, Rohan" <rohan.g.thomas@...era.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>,
Boon Khai Ng <boon.khai.ng@...era.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 2/3] net: stmmac: Consider Tx VLAN offload tag
length for maxSDU
Hi All,
On 10/17/2025 11:41 AM, Rohan G Thomas via B4 Relay wrote:
>
> + sdu_len = skb->len;
> /* Check if VLAN can be inserted by HW */
> has_vlan = stmmac_vlan_insert(priv, skb, tx_q);
> + if (has_vlan)
> + sdu_len += VLAN_HLEN;
> +
> + if (priv->est && priv->est->enable &&
> + priv->est->max_sdu[queue] &&
> + skb->len > priv->est->max_sdu[queue]){
I just noticed an issue with the reworked fix after sending the patch.
The condition should be: sdu_len > priv->est->max_sdu[queue]
I’ll send a corrected version, and will wait for any additional comments
in the meantime.
> + priv->xstats.max_sdu_txq_drop[queue]++;
> + goto max_sdu_err;
> + }
>
> entry = tx_q->cur_tx;
> first_entry = entry;
>
Best Regards,
Rohan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists