[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251017093146.169996-2-phasta@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 11:31:47 +0200
From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
tursulin@...ulin.net
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] dma-fence: Remove 64-bit flag
It seems that DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SEQNO64_BIT has no real effects anymore,
since seqno is a u64 everywhere.
Remove the unneeded flag.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
---
Seems to me that this flag doesn't really do anything anymore?
I *suspect* that it could be that some drivers pass a u32 to
dma_fence_init()? I guess they could be ported, couldn't they.
P.
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 3 +--
include/linux/dma-fence.h | 10 +---------
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
index 3f78c56b58dc..24794c027813 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
@@ -1078,8 +1078,7 @@ void
dma_fence_init64(struct dma_fence *fence, const struct dma_fence_ops *ops,
spinlock_t *lock, u64 context, u64 seqno)
{
- __dma_fence_init(fence, ops, lock, context, seqno,
- BIT(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SEQNO64_BIT));
+ __dma_fence_init(fence, ops, lock, context, seqno, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_init64);
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
index 64639e104110..4eca2db28625 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ struct dma_fence {
};
enum dma_fence_flag_bits {
- DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SEQNO64_BIT,
DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT,
DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT,
@@ -470,14 +469,7 @@ dma_fence_is_signaled(struct dma_fence *fence)
*/
static inline bool __dma_fence_is_later(struct dma_fence *fence, u64 f1, u64 f2)
{
- /* This is for backward compatibility with drivers which can only handle
- * 32bit sequence numbers. Use a 64bit compare when the driver says to
- * do so.
- */
- if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SEQNO64_BIT, &fence->flags))
- return f1 > f2;
-
- return (int)(lower_32_bits(f1) - lower_32_bits(f2)) > 0;
+ return f1 > f2;
}
/**
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists