[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ace674c-9d57-4500-b155-caa662903774@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:28:15 +0530
From: Harikrishna shenoy <h-shenoy@...com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <rfoss@...nel.org>,
<Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, <jonas@...boo.se>,
<jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, <airlied@...il.com>, <simona@...ll.ch>,
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
<tzimmermann@...e.de>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <sjakhade@...ence.com>, <yamonkar@...ence.com>,
<lumag@...nel.org>, <dianders@...omium.org>, <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
<luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>, <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devarsht@...com>, <u-kumar1@...com>,
<s-jain1@...com>, <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: MHDP8546 bridge binding
changes for DSC
On 22/09/25 13:11, Harikrishna Shenoy wrote:
>
>
> On 9/18/25 07:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 04:00:40PM +0530, Harikrishna Shenoy wrote:
>>> From: Swapnil Jakhade<sjakhade@...ence.com>
>>>
>>> Add binding changes for DSC(Display Stream Compression) in the MHDP8546
>>> DPI/DP bridge.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Swapnil Jakhade<sjakhade@...ence.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Harikrishna Shenoy<h-shenoy@...com>
>>> ---
>>> .../display/bridge/cdns,mhdp8546.yaml | 24 ++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,mhdp8546.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,mhdp8546.yaml
>>> index c2b369456e4e..2a05a7d5847f 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,mhdp8546.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,mhdp8546.yaml
>>> @@ -27,13 +27,12 @@ properties:
>>> Register block for DSS_EDP0_INTG_CFG_VP registers in case of TI J7 SoCs.
>>> - description:
>>> Register block of mhdptx sapb registers.
>>> + - description:
>>> + Register block for mhdptx DSC encoder registers.
>>>
>>> reg-names:
>>> - minItems: 1
>>> - items:
>>> - - const: mhdptx
>>> - - const: j721e-intg
>>> - - const: mhdptx-sapb
>>> + description:
>>> + Names corresponding to entries in the reg property.
>> No, top-level should have broadest constraints. In your case it is
>> min/maxItems.
>>
>> Description is completely redundant. Wasn't here before, so why adding
>> it?
>>
> Noted, will remove description and add minItems:1.
>>>
>>> clocks:
>>> maxItems: 1
>>> @@ -100,18 +99,25 @@ allOf:
>>> properties:
>>> reg:
>>> minItems: 2
>>> - maxItems: 3
>>> + maxItems: 4
>>> reg-names:
>>> minItems: 2
>>> - maxItems: 3
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: mhdptx
>>> + - const: j721e-intg
>>> + - const: mhdptx-sapb
>>> + - const: dsc
>>> else:
>>> properties:
>>> reg:
>>> minItems: 1
>>> - maxItems: 2
>>> + maxItems: 3
>>> reg-names:
>>> minItems: 1
>>> - maxItems: 2
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: mhdptx
>>> + - const: mhdptx-sapb
>> This is wrong. Previously CDNS variant had two items means it had
>> "j721e-intg". Now it's something else.
>>
>> First, this is an ABI break.
>>
>> Second, there is no explanation at all for it in the commit msg! Looks
>> like random change.
>>
>> Read carefully writing-bindings doc.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>
> Keeping this patch series aside, The existing binding-docs clearly have
> a bug.
>
> Since even for cadence specific compatible "cdns,mhdp8546" it
> compulsorily expects "j721e-intg" register space
>
> which is NOT part of the cadence IP block mhdp8546 and hence not
> applicable to "cdns,mhdp8546".
>
> This was also discussed here [1] and can also be referred in this TRM
> section [2],
>
> which clearly show that "j721e-intg" is part of TI wrapper IP block and
> should be
>
> applicable to "ti,j721e-mhdp8546" compatible.
>
> Yes agreed it breaks the ABI but it also fixes a bug and I don't see any
> one using only "cdns,mhdp8546" yet.
>
> so I am thinking it's more appropriate to fix this as a separate patch
> independent of this series.
>
> Kindly let me know if I should submit a separate patch to fix this bug
> or I should just ignore this bug.
>
> Depending on your suggestion, if it's agreed upon to send the bug fix
> patch first, I will send out an independent
>
> bug fix to remove "j721e-intg" for compatible "cdns,mhdp8546" and then
> rebase the series for adding DSC reg blocks
>
> on top of bug fix.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250903220312.GA2903503-
> robh@...nel.org/ <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250903220312.GA2903503-
> robh@...nel.org/>
> [2]: Link to TRM ZIP:https://www.ti.com/lit/zip/spruil1 <https://
> www.ti.com/lit/zip/spruil1>
> Table 2-1. MAIN Domain Memory Map
> DSS_EDP0_V2A_CORE_VP_REGS_APB are EDP core register identified by name
> mhdptx in DT.
> DSS_EDP0_INTG_CFG_VP identified by j721e-intg in DT.
>
> Section 12.6.6.16.4: EDP_CFG Registers
>
> Driver use: TI j721e Cadence MHDP8546 DP wrapper(drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/
> cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-j721e.c)
>
>
> Regards.
Hi Krzysztof,
Could you please let us know your thoughts on above, will re-spin it
accordingly.
Regards.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists