[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251017121447.GH3901471@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:14:47 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] PCI/P2PDMA: Export pci_p2pdma_map_type() function
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 11:31:53PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Nacked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
> As explained to you multiple times, pci_p2pdma_map_type is a low-level
> helper that absolutely MUST be wrapper in proper accessors.
You never responded to the discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250727190252.GF7551@nvidia.com/
What is the plan here? Is the new DMA API unusable by modules? That
seems a little challenging.
> It is dangerous when used incorrectly and requires too much boiler
> plate. There is no way this can be directly exported, and you
> really need to stop resending this.
Yeah, I don't like the boilerplate at all either.
It looks like there is a simple enough solution here. I wanted to
tackle this after, but maybe it is small enough to do it now.
dmabuf should gain some helpers like BIO has to manage its map/unmap
flows, so lets put a start of some helpers in
drivers/dma/dma-mapping.c (or whatever). dmabuf is a built in so it
can call the function without exporting it just like block and hmm are
doing.
The same code as in this vfio patch will get moved into the helper and
vfio will call it under its dmabuf map/unmap ops.
The goal would be to make it much easier for other dmabuf exporters to
switch from dma_map_resource() to this new dmabuf api which is safe
for P2P.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists