[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251018035738.4039621-4-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 11:57:38 +0800
From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...weicloud.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] selftests/bpf/benchs: Add overwrite mode benchmark for BPF ring buffer
From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>
Add --rb-overwrite option to benchmark BPF ring buffer in overwrite mode.
Since overwrite mode is not yet supported by libbpf for consumer, also add
--rb-bench-producer option to benchmark producer directly without a consumer.
Benchmarks on an x86_64 and an arm64 CPU are shown below for reference.
- AMD EPYC 9654 (x86_64)
Ringbuf, multi-producer contention in overwrite mode, no consumer
=================================================================
rb-prod nr_prod 1 32.180 ± 0.033M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 2 9.617 ± 0.003M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 3 8.810 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 4 9.272 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 8 9.173 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 12 3.086 ± 0.032M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 16 2.945 ± 0.021M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 20 2.519 ± 0.021M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 24 2.545 ± 0.021M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 28 2.363 ± 0.024M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 32 2.357 ± 0.021M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 36 2.267 ± 0.011M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 40 2.284 ± 0.020M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 44 2.215 ± 0.025M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 48 2.193 ± 0.023M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 52 2.208 ± 0.024M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
- HiSilicon Kunpeng 920 (arm64)
Ringbuf, multi-producer contention in overwrite mode, no consumer
=================================================================
rb-prod nr_prod 1 14.478 ± 0.006M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 2 21.787 ± 0.010M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 3 6.045 ± 0.001M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 4 5.352 ± 0.003M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 8 4.850 ± 0.002M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 12 3.542 ± 0.016M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 16 3.509 ± 0.021M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 20 3.171 ± 0.010M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 24 3.154 ± 0.014M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 28 2.974 ± 0.015M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 32 3.167 ± 0.014M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 36 2.903 ± 0.010M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 40 2.866 ± 0.010M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 44 2.914 ± 0.010M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
rb-prod nr_prod 48 2.806 ± 0.012M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
Rb-prod nr_prod 52 2.840 ± 0.012M/s (drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s)
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++--
.../bpf/benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh | 4 ++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/ringbuf_bench.c | 11 ++++
3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c
index e1ee979e6acc..212859fb2961 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ static struct {
int ringbuf_sz; /* per-ringbuf, in bytes */
bool ringbuf_use_output; /* use slower output API */
int perfbuf_sz; /* per-CPU size, in pages */
+ bool overwrite;
+ bool bench_producer;
} args = {
.back2back = false,
.batch_cnt = 500,
@@ -27,6 +29,8 @@ static struct {
.ringbuf_sz = 512 * 1024,
.ringbuf_use_output = false,
.perfbuf_sz = 128,
+ .overwrite = false,
+ .bench_producer = false,
};
enum {
@@ -35,6 +39,8 @@ enum {
ARG_RB_BATCH_CNT = 2002,
ARG_RB_SAMPLED = 2003,
ARG_RB_SAMPLE_RATE = 2004,
+ ARG_RB_OVERWRITE = 2005,
+ ARG_RB_BENCH_PRODUCER = 2006,
};
static const struct argp_option opts[] = {
@@ -43,6 +49,8 @@ static const struct argp_option opts[] = {
{ "rb-batch-cnt", ARG_RB_BATCH_CNT, "CNT", 0, "Set BPF-side record batch count"},
{ "rb-sampled", ARG_RB_SAMPLED, NULL, 0, "Notification sampling"},
{ "rb-sample-rate", ARG_RB_SAMPLE_RATE, "RATE", 0, "Notification sample rate"},
+ { "rb-overwrite", ARG_RB_OVERWRITE, NULL, 0, "Overwrite mode"},
+ { "rb-bench-producer", ARG_RB_BENCH_PRODUCER, NULL, 0, "Benchmark producer"},
{},
};
@@ -72,6 +80,12 @@ static error_t parse_arg(int key, char *arg, struct argp_state *state)
argp_usage(state);
}
break;
+ case ARG_RB_OVERWRITE:
+ args.overwrite = true;
+ break;
+ case ARG_RB_BENCH_PRODUCER:
+ args.bench_producer = true;
+ break;
default:
return ARGP_ERR_UNKNOWN;
}
@@ -95,8 +109,33 @@ static inline void bufs_trigger_batch(void)
static void bufs_validate(void)
{
- if (env.consumer_cnt != 1) {
- fprintf(stderr, "rb-libbpf benchmark needs one consumer!\n");
+ if (args.bench_producer && strcmp(env.bench_name, "rb-libbpf")) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "--rb-bench-producer only works with rb-libbpf!\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ if (args.overwrite && !args.bench_producer) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "overwrite mode only works with --rb-bench-producer for now!\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ if (args.bench_producer && env.consumer_cnt != 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "no consumer is needed for --rb-bench-producer!\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ if (args.bench_producer && args.back2back) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "back-to-back mode makes no sense for --rb-bench-producer!\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ if (args.bench_producer && args.sampled) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "sampling mode makes no sense for --rb-bench-producer!\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ if (!args.bench_producer && env.consumer_cnt != 1) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "benchmarks without --rb-bench-producer require exactly one consumer!\n");
exit(1);
}
@@ -128,12 +167,17 @@ static void ringbuf_libbpf_measure(struct bench_res *res)
{
struct ringbuf_libbpf_ctx *ctx = &ringbuf_libbpf_ctx;
- res->hits = atomic_swap(&buf_hits.value, 0);
+ if (args.bench_producer)
+ res->hits = atomic_swap(&ctx->skel->bss->hits, 0);
+ else
+ res->hits = atomic_swap(&buf_hits.value, 0);
res->drops = atomic_swap(&ctx->skel->bss->dropped, 0);
}
static struct ringbuf_bench *ringbuf_setup_skeleton(void)
{
+ __u32 flags;
+ struct bpf_map *ringbuf;
struct ringbuf_bench *skel;
setup_libbpf();
@@ -146,12 +190,19 @@ static struct ringbuf_bench *ringbuf_setup_skeleton(void)
skel->rodata->batch_cnt = args.batch_cnt;
skel->rodata->use_output = args.ringbuf_use_output ? 1 : 0;
+ skel->rodata->bench_producer = args.bench_producer;
if (args.sampled)
/* record data + header take 16 bytes */
skel->rodata->wakeup_data_size = args.sample_rate * 16;
- bpf_map__set_max_entries(skel->maps.ringbuf, args.ringbuf_sz);
+ ringbuf = skel->maps.ringbuf;
+ if (args.overwrite) {
+ flags = bpf_map__map_flags(ringbuf) | BPF_F_RB_OVERWRITE;
+ bpf_map__set_map_flags(ringbuf, flags);
+ }
+
+ bpf_map__set_max_entries(ringbuf, args.ringbuf_sz);
if (ringbuf_bench__load(skel)) {
fprintf(stderr, "failed to load skeleton\n");
@@ -171,10 +222,13 @@ static void ringbuf_libbpf_setup(void)
{
struct ringbuf_libbpf_ctx *ctx = &ringbuf_libbpf_ctx;
struct bpf_link *link;
+ int map_fd;
ctx->skel = ringbuf_setup_skeleton();
- ctx->ringbuf = ring_buffer__new(bpf_map__fd(ctx->skel->maps.ringbuf),
- buf_process_sample, NULL, NULL);
+
+ map_fd = bpf_map__fd(ctx->skel->maps.ringbuf);
+ ctx->ringbuf = ring_buffer__new(map_fd, buf_process_sample,
+ NULL, NULL);
if (!ctx->ringbuf) {
fprintf(stderr, "failed to create ringbuf\n");
exit(1);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh
index 91e3567962ff..83e05e837871 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh
@@ -49,3 +49,7 @@ for b in 1 2 3 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52; do
summarize "rb-libbpf nr_prod $b" "$($RUN_RB_BENCH -p$b --rb-batch-cnt 50 rb-libbpf)"
done
+header "Ringbuf, multi-producer contention in overwrite mode, no consumer"
+for b in 1 2 3 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52; do
+ summarize "rb-prod nr_prod $b" "$($RUN_BENCH -p$b --rb-batch-cnt 50 --rb-overwrite --rb-bench-producer rb-libbpf)"
+done
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ringbuf_bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ringbuf_bench.c
index 6a468496f539..d96c7d1e8fc2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ringbuf_bench.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ringbuf_bench.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
// Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook
+#include <stdbool.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
@@ -14,9 +15,11 @@ struct {
const volatile int batch_cnt = 0;
const volatile long use_output = 0;
+const volatile bool bench_producer = false;
long sample_val = 42;
long dropped __attribute__((aligned(128))) = 0;
+long hits __attribute__((aligned(128))) = 0;
const volatile long wakeup_data_size = 0;
@@ -24,6 +27,9 @@ static __always_inline long get_flags()
{
long sz;
+ if (bench_producer)
+ return BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP;
+
if (!wakeup_data_size)
return 0;
@@ -47,6 +53,8 @@ int bench_ringbuf(void *ctx)
*sample = sample_val;
flags = get_flags();
bpf_ringbuf_submit(sample, flags);
+ if (bench_producer)
+ __sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, 1);
}
}
} else {
@@ -55,6 +63,9 @@ int bench_ringbuf(void *ctx)
if (bpf_ringbuf_output(&ringbuf, &sample_val,
sizeof(sample_val), flags))
__sync_add_and_fetch(&dropped, 1);
+ else if (bench_producer)
+ __sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, 1);
+
}
}
return 0;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists