[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANAwSgTtaAtCxtF+DGS-Ay4O3_9JMwk-fJ27yoijhWWbF2URrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 14:52:34 +0530
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: j721e: Propagate dev_err_probe return value
Hi Markus,
Thanks for the review comments.
On Sat, 18 Oct 2025 at 14:26, Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
>
> > Ensure that the return value from dev_err_probe() is consistently assigned
> > back to ret in all error paths within j721e_pcie_probe(). This ensures
> > the original error code are propagation for debugging.
>
> I find the change description improvable.
>
Ok, I will update this once I get some more feedback on the changes.
>
> I propose to take another source code transformation approach better into account.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17.1/source/drivers/base/core.c#L5031-L5075
>
> Example:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17.1/source/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c#L444-L636
>
> ret = dev_err_probe(dev, cdns_pcie_init_phy(dev, cdns_pcie), "Failed to init phy\n");
> if (ret)
> goto err_get_sync;
>
No, the correct code ensures that dev_err_probe() is only called when
an actual error
has occurred, providing a clear and accurate log entry. For deferred
probe (-EPROBE_DEFER),
it will correctly log at a debug level, as intended for that scenario.
For other errors,
it will provide a standard error message.
>
> How do you think about to achieve such a source code variant also with the help of
> the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software)?
I do not have any idea about this.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Thanks
-Anand
Powered by blists - more mailing lists