[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251018100314.GAaPNl4ngomUnreTbZ@fat_crate.local>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 12:03:14 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
peterz@...radead.org, mario.limonciello@....com, riel@...riel.com,
yazen.ghannam@....com, me@...aill.net, kai.huang@...el.com,
sandipan.das@....com, darwi@...utronix.de, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/amd: Disable RDSEED on AMD Zen5 because of an
error.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 10:40:10PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote:
> Under unknown conditions, Zen5 chips running rdseed can produce
> (val=0,CF=1) over 10% of the time (when rdseed is successful).
> CF=1 indicates success, while val=0 is typically only produced
> when rdseed fails (CF=0).
>
> This suggests there is a bug which causes rdseed to silently fail.
>
> This was reproduced reliably by launching 2-threads per available
> core, 1-thread per for hamming on RDSEED, and 1-thread per core
> collectively eating and hammering on ~90% of memory.
Which version of RDSEED was used? 32-bit perhaps? Can you repro this with
the 64-bit version of RDSEED?
> This was observed on more than 1 Zen5 model, so it should be disabled
> for all of Zen5 until/unless a comprehensive blacklist can be built.
As I said the last time, we're working on it. Be patient pls.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists