[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251018141341.3ef2f6b7@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 14:13:41 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>,
Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>, nuno.sa@...log.com,
dlechner@...libre.com, andy@...nel.org, marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] spi: offload: Add offset parameter
On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 13:14:06 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2025 11:25:41 -0300, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> > Add an offset parameter that can be passed in the periodic trigger.
> > This is useful for example when ADC drivers implement a separate periodic
> > signal to trigger conversion and need offload to read the result with
> > some delay. While at it, add some documentation to offload periodic trigger
> > parameters.
> >
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1/1] spi: offload: Add offset parameter
> commit: b83fb1b14c06bdd765903ac852ba20a14e24f227
>
Hi Mark,
The patch called out that we are after an immutable branch or similar for this one.
"
Hello,
This patch adds a small feature that is required for a series improving ad4030
in the IIO subsystem [1]. Can we have an immutable branch with this patch so
that it can be used as base for the IIO driver changes?
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/cover.1758916484.git.marcelo.schmitt@analog.com/
"
If you can still set that up, much appreciated.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
>
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
>
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
>
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists