[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8168ad35-4f2c-4082-b372-cfb8f75cc78a@web.de>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 16:20:16 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: j721e: Use inline reset GPIO assignment and drop
local variable
> Change removes the unnecessary local gpiod variable and assigns the result
> of the devm_gpiod_get_optional() call directly to pcie->reset_gpio.
> This makes the code more concise and readable without changing the
> behavior.
Will another imperative wording approach become more helpful for an improved
change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.18-rc1#n94
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists