[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251018171425.7515d39f@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 17:14:25 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Jorge Marques <jorge.marques@...log.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich
<Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, "David Lechner" <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko
<andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] iio: adc: ad4062: Add IIO Trigger support
On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 09:28:03 +0200
Jorge Marques <jorge.marques@...log.com> wrote:
> Adds support for IIO Trigger. Optionally, gp1 is assigned as Data Ready
> signal, if not present, fallback to an I3C IBI with the same role.
> The software trigger is allocated by the device, but must be attached by
> the user before enabling the buffer. The purpose is to not impede
> removing the driver due to the increased reference count when
> iio_trigger_set_immutable or iio_trigger_get is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Marques <jorge.marques@...log.com>
A few things inline.
Thanks,
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4062.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4062.c
> index e55a69c62694a71a4e29f29b9a2bfeec3b16c990..40b7c10b8ce7145b010bb11e8e4698baacb6b3d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4062.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4062.c
> +static irqreturn_t ad4062_poll_handler(int irq, void *p)
> +{
> + struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> + struct ad4062_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + u8 addr = AD4062_REG_CONV_TRIGGER;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Read current and trigger next conversion */
> + struct i3c_priv_xfer t[2] = {
> + {
> + .data.in = &st->raw,
If it is safe to use addr on the stack, do we need to have
a dma safe buffer for raw? I'm not sure for i3c!
> + .len = 4,
> + .rnw = true,
> + },
> + {
> + .data.out = &addr,
> + .len = 1,
> + .rnw = false,
> + }
> + };
> +
> + /* Separated transfers to not infeer repeated-start */
> + ret = i3c_device_do_priv_xfers(st->i3cdev, &t[0], 1);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + ret = i3c_device_do_priv_xfers(st->i3cdev, &t[1], 1);
Add a comment on this. I assume it's setting things up for the next
scan?
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, &st->raw,
> + pf->timestamp);
> +
> +out:
> + iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> +
> +static int ad4062_triggered_buffer_predisable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> + struct ad4062_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&st->i3cdev->dev);
Take a look at the changes across the tree recently.
Now pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() calls pm_runtime_mark_last_busy()
internally to avoid the need for this pair.
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&st->i3cdev->dev);
> + return 0;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists