[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <hmch7csqotxt42snddksce2mpnjeglbgvoxs6r5qlu7v2ayxyk@zctj7xhugeln>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 08:43:47 +0800
From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
To: Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>, Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>,
Vivian Wang <wangruikang@...as.ac.cn>, Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-sophgo: Add phy interface filter
On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 08:05:48AM +0800, Yixun Lan wrote:
> Hi Inochi,
>
> On 09:18 Fri 17 Oct , Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > As the SG2042 has an internal rx delay, the delay should be remove
> s/remove/removed/
> > when init the mac, otherwise the phy will be misconfigurated.
> s/init/initialize/
> >
> > Fixes: 543009e2d4cd ("net: stmmac: dwmac-sophgo: Add support for Sophgo SG2042 SoC")
> > Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
> > Tested-by: Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>
> > ---
> > .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sophgo.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sophgo.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sophgo.c
> > index 3b7947a7a7ba..b2dee1399eb0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sophgo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sophgo.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/property.h>
> > #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >
> > @@ -29,8 +30,23 @@ static int sophgo_sg2044_dwmac_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int sophgo_sg2042_set_mode(struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat_dat)
> > +{
> > + switch (plat_dat->phy_interface) {
> > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
> > + plat_dat->phy_interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID;
> > + return 0;
> > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
> > + plat_dat->phy_interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII;
> > + return 0;
> > + default:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static int sophgo_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > + int (*plat_set_mode)(struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat_dat);
> > struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat_dat;
> > struct stmmac_resources stmmac_res;
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -50,11 +66,18 @@ static int sophgo_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + plat_set_mode = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > + if (plat_set_mode) {
> > + ret = plat_set_mode(plat_dat);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > return stmmac_dvr_probe(dev, plat_dat, &stmmac_res);
> > }
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id sophgo_dwmac_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-dwmac" },
> > + { .compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-dwmac", .data = sophgo_sg2042_set_mode },
> I'd personally prefer to introduce a flag for this, it would be more readable and
> maintainable, something like
> struct sophgo_dwmac_compitable_data {
> bool has_internal_rx_delay;
> }
>
> then.
> if (data->has_internal_rx_delay)
> sophgo_sg2042_set_mode(..)
>
>
> > { .compatible = "sophgo,sg2044-dwmac" },
> > { /* sentinel */ }
> > };
Yeah, I think this is a good idea, thanks.
Regards,
Inochi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists