[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <176080800602.47136.11869769472487961810.b4-ty@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 19:20:06 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: samsung: clk-pll: simplify
samsung_pll_lock_wait()
On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 06:27:16 +0100, André Draszik wrote:
> readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic() has been updated in 2023 in
> commit 7349a69cf312 ("iopoll: Do not use timekeeping in
> read_poll_timeout_atomic()") to avoid usage of timekeeping APIs. It
> also never used udelay() when no delay was given.
>
> With the implementation avoiding timekeeping APIs, and with a caller
> not passing a delay, the timeout argument simply becomes a loop
> counter.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] clk: samsung: clk-pll: simplify samsung_pll_lock_wait()
https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/d669ec6be0b1965c67248407d87c848b1b7c12ae
Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists