[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPPOu431u8MPUN0p@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 20:30:35 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Francesco Lavra <flavra@...libre.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: fix array size for
st_lsm6dsx_settings fields
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 07:32:08PM +0200, Francesco Lavra wrote:
> The `decimator` and `batch` fields of struct st_lsm6dsx_settings
> are arrays indexed by sensor type, not by sensor hardware
> identifier; moreover, the `batch` field is only used for the
> accelerometer and gyroscope.
> Change the array size for `decimator` from ST_LSM6DSX_MAX_ID to
> ST_LSM6DSX_ID_MAX, and change the array size for `batch` from
> ST_LSM6DSX_MAX_ID to 2; move the enum st_lsm6dsx_sensor_id
> definition so that the ST_LSM6DSX_ID_MAX value is usable within
> the struct st_lsm6dsx_settings definition.
...
> +enum st_lsm6dsx_sensor_id {
> + ST_LSM6DSX_ID_GYRO,
> + ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC,
> + ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT0,
> + ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT1,
> + ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT2,
> + ST_LSM6DSX_ID_MAX,
Is it a termination entry? (Looks like that to me) Can we drop trailing comma
while at it?
> +};
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists