linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel: resourse: Add conditional handling for ACPI device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aPPlVmJXKcMYmjXp@ashevche-desk.local>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 22:07:02 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Szuying Chen <chensiying21@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, gourry@...rry.net,
	jhubbard@...dia.com, akinobu.mita@...il.com, sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, huang.ying.caritas@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew_Su@...edia.com.tw,
	Yd_Tseng@...edia.com.tw, Ed_Huang@...edia.com.tw,
	Cindy1_Hsu@...edia.com.tw, Jesse1_Chang@...edia.com.tw,
	Richard_Hsu@...edia.com.tw, Chloe_Chen@...edia.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: resourse: Add conditional handling for ACPI
 device

On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 10:35:31AM +0800, Szuying Chen wrote:
> To avoid address conflicts and related errors, specific checks for
> the ACPI device "AMDIF031" should be bypassed.

TL;DR: NAK.

No, this is not how we should do the quirks (besides the use of CamelCase).
Also, please provide more info why firmware may not be fixed properly at
the same time, so we won't need this on an updated version?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko