[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPPmsBHnmKQ1sa3O@ashevche-desk.local>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 22:12:48 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: sboyd@...nel.org, jic23@...nel.org, dlechner@...libre.com,
nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, srini@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
kishon@...nel.org, sre@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com, wenst@...omium.org, casey.connolly@...aro.org,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angleogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] spmi: Print error status with %pe format
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 12:43:55PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Instead of printing just a number, use the %pe format for error
> status, increasing readability of error prints.
...
> err = device_add(&sdev->dev);
> if (err < 0) {
> - dev_err(&sdev->dev, "Can't add %s, status %d\n",
> - dev_name(&sdev->dev), err);
> + dev_err(&sdev->dev, "Can't add %s, status %pe\n",
> + dev_name(&sdev->dev), ERR_PTR(err));
LOL, I only now noticed that the parameter to dev_err() and dev_name() is the
same. For christ's sake, why do we need dev_name()?
> goto err_device_add;
> }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists