[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251018234411.34877-1-wbg@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 08:44:09 +0900
From: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.caveayland@...anix.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: 104-idio-16: Define maximum valid register address offset
On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 10:00:43PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 09:58:01AM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > Attempting to load the 104-idio-16 module fails during regmap
> > initialization with a return error -EINVAL. This is a result of the
> > regmap cache failing initialization. Set the idio_16_regmap_config
> > max_register member to fix this failure.
>
> > Fixes: 2c210c9a34a3 ("gpio: 104-idio-16: Migrate to the regmap API")
> > Reported-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.caveayland@...anix.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9b0375fd-235f-4ee1-a7fa-daca296ef6bf@nutanix.com
>
> Link --> Closes ?
So that link points to a report detailing multiple bugs, but this patch
only fixes one of those bugs. Is it still appropriate to use Closes in
this case?
William Breathitt Gray
Powered by blists - more mailing lists