[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPRGsKGDrYlyoTje@makrotopia.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 03:02:24 +0100
From: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Yu Jiaoliang <yujiaoliang@...o.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Changqi Hu <changqi.hu@...iatek.com>,
Sam Shih <sam.shih@...iatek.com>,
Steven Liu <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] serial: 8250_mtk: Enable baud clock and manage in
runtime PM
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:00:57PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On 16/09/2025 23:37, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Some MediaTek SoCs got a gated UART baud clock, which currently gets
> > disabled as the clk subsystem believes it would be unused. This results in
> > the uart freezing right after "clk: Disabling unused clocks" on those
> > platforms.
> >
> > Request the baud clock to be prepared and enabled during probe, and to
> > restore run-time power management capabilities to what it was before commit
> > e32a83c70cf9 ("serial: 8250-mtk: modify mtk uart power and clock
> > management") disable and unprepare the baud clock when suspending the UART,
> > prepare and enable it again when resuming it.
> >
> > Fixes: e32a83c70cf9 ("serial: 8250-mtk: modify mtk uart power and clock management")
>
> Most of the issues from this commit are already fixed in
> b6c7ff2693ddc ("serial: 8250_mtk: Simplify clock sequencing and runtime PM")
> which is more or less a revert of e32a83c70cf9.
>
> I think we should add
> Fixes: b6c7ff2693ddc ("serial: 8250_mtk: Simplify clock sequencing and runtime PM")
> here as well. It's a fix of a fix :)
Just a friendly ping about this patch :)
Should I resend the patch with the added Fixes:-tag? Or can it be merged
including the tag added my Matthias without a resend?
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> > ---
> > v3: squash into single patch
> > v2: add managing run-time PM in dedicated patch
> >
> > drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
> > index b44de2ed7413..5875a7b9b4b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
> > @@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk8250_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > while
> > (serial_in(up, MTK_UART_DEBUG0));
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(data->uart_clk);
> > clk_disable_unprepare(data->bus_clk);
> > return 0;
> > @@ -445,6 +446,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk8250_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> > struct mtk8250_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > clk_prepare_enable(data->bus_clk);
> > + clk_prepare_enable(data->uart_clk);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -475,13 +477,13 @@ static int mtk8250_probe_of(struct platform_device *pdev, struct uart_port *p,
> > int dmacnt;
> > #endif
> > - data->uart_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "baud");
> > + data->uart_clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "baud");
> > if (IS_ERR(data->uart_clk)) {
> > /*
> > * For compatibility with older device trees try unnamed
> > * clk when no baud clk can be found.
> > */
> > - data->uart_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > + data->uart_clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > if (IS_ERR(data->uart_clk)) {
> > dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Can't get uart clock\n");
> > return PTR_ERR(data->uart_clk);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists