[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <st7oizyyih3fnsi7jgcp47pl7s6n3gz2rdcv7iryftol3bqvxk@buam77hiqnl6>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 14:51:00 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
Casey Connolly <casey@...nolly.tech>,
Joel Selvaraj <foss@...lselvaraj.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Pixel 3 and Pixel
3 XL
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 06:59:14PM +0200, David Heidelberg wrote:
> On 06/10/2025 00:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 05, 2025 at 03:16:29PM +0200, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
> > >
> > > This adds initial device tree support for the following phones:
> > >
> > > - Google Pixel 3 (blueline)
> > > - Google Pixel 3 XL (crosshatch)
> >
> > Great to finally see it being submitted!
> >
> > >
> > > Both phone boards use the same identifiers and differ only slightly
> > > in their connected peripherals.
> > >
> > > Supported functionality includes:
> > > - Debug UART
> > > - UFS
> > > - Charger
> > > - USB-C (peripheral mode)
> > > - Display (Pixel 3 only)
> >
> > No remoteprocs / IPA / GPU / Venus / WiFi / BT? The firmware is
> > accessible to download from Google and it can be further repackaged (but
> > not redistributed). See [1], [2].
> >
> > The phones share all firmware except for the bdwlan, so hopefully you
> > can add 'Google/blueline/foo.mbn' to the common file.
>
> Would it be acceptable to use path format qcom/sdm845/$codename/ e.g.
> qcom/sdm845/blueline as it's used elsewhere?
We have settled on qcom/SoC/Vendor/device/ long ago. Could you please
follow? All upstream Qualcomm devices follow this approach.
bdwlan should be sent to ath10k ML:
https://wireless.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/en/users/drivers/ath10k/boardfiles.html
> As I'm looking at the Google scripts, I assume both blueline/crosshatch use
> same firmware (which makes sense, as only the battery and display is
> different).
>
> David
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists