linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: qcom: gcc-glymur: Remove 85.71 MHz USB4 master clock frequency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yr6vld475g7lkqjr53tnyllkdvm2zyclifwpm5ljlhg353dbsd@jy5yycwmf4nm>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 18:43:19 +0300
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: qcom: gcc-glymur: Remove 85.71 MHz USB4 master
 clock frequency

On 25-10-10 12:24:52, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> 
> The USB4 HPG says this frequency remains unused, remove it from the
> frequency table to avoid any misunderstandings.
> 
> The reason it's unused seems to be that the lower RPMh level required
> to support it (LOW_SVS) is not enough for other pieces of the pipeline
> which require SVS, which in turn is enough to support a faster, 175-ish
> MHz rate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>

Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>