linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630/660: Add CDSP-related nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dab30485-498e-4cae-93eb-b2f40f928465@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 14:39:37 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@...nlining.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        linux@...nlining.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630/660: Add CDSP-related nodes

On 10/20/25 2:38 PM, Nickolay Goppen wrote:
> 
> 20.10.2025 15:27, Konrad Dybcio пишет:
>> On 10/19/25 6:27 PM, Nickolay Goppen wrote:
>>> In order to enable CDSP support for SDM660 SoC:
>>>   * add shared memory p2p nodes for CDSP
>>>   * add CDSP-specific smmu node
>>>   * add CDSP peripheral image loader node
> [...]
>>>           ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm636.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm636.dtsi
>>> index ae15d81fa3f9..41e4e97f7747 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm636.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm636.dtsi
>>> @@ -16,6 +16,20 @@
>>>    * be addressed when the aforementioned
>>>    * peripherals will be enabled upstream.
>>>    */
>> You can now remove the above comment ("Turing IP" is CDSP)
>>
> Remove the whole comment?

Yeah since it's addressed now

Konrad