[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cdb598ce-88ec-0c3c-8e4b-b557093bea92@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 14:48:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>
cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, DMML <dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] dm-bufio: align write boundary on bdev_logical_block_size
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> When performing a read-modify-write(RMW) operation, any modification
> to a buffered block must cause the entire buffer to be marked dirty.
>
> Marking only a subrange as dirty is incorrect because the underlying
> device block size(ubs) defines the minimum read/write granularity. A
> lower device can perform I/O only on regions which are fully aligned
> and sized to ubs.
Hi
I think it would be better to fix this in dm-bufio, so that other dm-bufio
users would also benefit from the fix. Please try this patch - does it fix
it?
Mikulas
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
There may be devices with logical block size larger than 4k. Fix
dm-bufio, so that it will align I/O on logical block size. This commit
fixes I/O errors on the dm-ebs target on the top of emulated nvme device
with 8k logical block size created with qemu parameters:
-device nvme,drive=drv0,serial=foo,logical_block_size=8192,physical_block_size=8192
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c 2025-10-13 21:42:47.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c 2025-10-20 14:40:32.000000000 +0200
@@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ static void submit_io(struct dm_buffer *
{
unsigned int n_sectors;
sector_t sector;
- unsigned int offset, end;
+ unsigned int offset, end, align;
b->end_io = end_io;
@@ -1388,9 +1388,10 @@ static void submit_io(struct dm_buffer *
b->c->write_callback(b);
offset = b->write_start;
end = b->write_end;
- offset &= -DM_BUFIO_WRITE_ALIGN;
- end += DM_BUFIO_WRITE_ALIGN - 1;
- end &= -DM_BUFIO_WRITE_ALIGN;
+ align = max(DM_BUFIO_WRITE_ALIGN, bdev_logical_block_size(b->c->bdev));
+ offset &= -align;
+ end += align - 1;
+ end &= -align;
if (unlikely(end > b->c->block_size))
end = b->c->block_size;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists