[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ba7350a-83a7-4c83-8d91-83803d0c06e8@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 16:13:28 +0200
From: Loïc Molinari <loic.molinari@...labora.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>, Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>,
Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Mikołaj Wasiak
<mikolaj.wasiak@...el.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@...el.com>, Andi Shyti
<andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Christopher Healy <healych@...zon.com>, Matthew Wilcox
<willy@...radead.org>, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/13] drm/gem: Add huge tmpfs mount point helper
On 20/10/2025 11:10, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 15/10/2025 16:30, Loïc Molinari wrote:
>> Add the drm_gem_huge_mnt_create() helper to avoid code duplication in
>> the i915, V3D, Panfrost and Panthor drivers. It creates and mounts a
>> dedicated huge tmpfs mountpoint, for the lifetime of a DRM device,
>> used at GEM object initialization.
>>
>> The next commits will port drivers to this helper.
>>
>> v3:
>> - store huge tmpfs mountpoint in drm_device
>>
>> v4:
>> - return 0 in builds with CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=n
>> - return 0 when huge_mnt already exists
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Loïc Molinari <loic.molinari@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/drm/drm_device.h | 11 ++++++++
>> include/drm/drm_gem.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
>> index a98d5744cc6c..db8c0a217add 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>> #include <linux/export.h>
>> #include <linux/file.h>
>> #include <linux/fs.h>
>> +#include <linux/fs_context.h>
>> #include <linux/iosys-map.h>
>> #include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>> @@ -82,6 +83,63 @@
>> * up at a later date, and as our interface with shmfs for memory
>> allocation.
>> */
>> +static void drm_gem_huge_mnt_free(struct drm_device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> + drm_WARN_ON(dev, dev->huge_mnt == NULL);
>
> I don't see a benefit of adding this check but maybe I am missing
> something.
That was mostly to detect and warn drivers setting the drm_device's
huge_mnt pointer directly. I can remove that.
>> +
>> + kern_unmount(dev->huge_mnt);
>> + dev->huge_mnt = NULL;
>
> Ditto - device is going away, no? So why bother clearing the pointer?
This one is necessary to let drivers tear down and reload.
drm_gem_huge_mnt_create() returns if the pointer isn't NULL.
> Also, is the compiler smart enough to not compile or complain this
> function is unused in the !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE case?
No compiler warnings, but this might not be the case with different
compilers/versions so I'll ifdef it out.
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * drm_gem_huge_mnt_create - Create, mount and use a huge tmpfs
>> mountpoint
>> + * @dev: drm_device a huge tmpfs mountpoint should be used with
>> + * @value: huge tmpfs mount option value
>> + *
>> + * This function creates and mounts a dedicated huge tmpfs mountpoint
>> for the
>> + * lifetime of the drm device @dev which is used at GEM object
>> initialization
>> + * with drm_gem_object_init().
>> + *
>> + * The most common option value @value is "within_size" which only
>> allocates
>> + * huge pages if the page will be fully within the GEM object size.
>> "always",
>> + * "advise" and "never" are supported too but the latter would just
>> create a
>> + * mountpoint similar to the default one (`shm_mnt`). See shmemfs and
>> + * Transparent Hugepage for more information.
>> + *
>> + * Returns:
>> + * 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
>> + */
>> +int drm_gem_huge_mnt_create(struct drm_device *dev, const char *value)
>> +{
>> + struct file_system_type *type;
>> + struct fs_context *fc;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE))
>> + return 0;
>
> Is there a specific reason why the !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE path is
> not implemented in the header as a static inline? That would enable
> those builds to avoid the pointless function in text and function call
> in the drivers.
Good point. I'll propose a new version with drm_gem_huge_mnt_create()
implemented as a static inline function that calls into
__drm_gem_huge_mnt_create() only for builds with
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y.
>
>> + if (unlikely(dev->huge_mnt))
>> + return 0;
>
> Any special reason why it is allowed to call it multiple times with
> success?
That was initially returning -EEXIST in v3 but got changed after review
to simplify call sites.
>
>> +
>> + type = get_fs_type("tmpfs");
>> + if (unlikely(!type))
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + fc = fs_context_for_mount(type, SB_KERNMOUNT);
>> + if (IS_ERR(fc))
>> + return PTR_ERR(fc);
>> + ret = vfs_parse_fs_string(fc, "source", "tmpfs");
>> + if (unlikely(ret))
>> + return -ENOPARAM;
>> + ret = vfs_parse_fs_string(fc, "huge", value);
>> + if (unlikely(ret))
>> + return -ENOPARAM;
>> +
>> + dev->huge_mnt = fc_mount_longterm(fc);
>> + put_fs_context(fc);
>> +
>> + return drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drm_gem_huge_mnt_free, NULL);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gem_huge_mnt_create);
>> +
>> static void
>> drm_gem_init_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *ptr)
>> {
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_device.h b/include/drm/drm_device.h
>> index 778b2cca6c49..352e3db402d7 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_device.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_device.h
>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>> #include <linux/list.h>
>> #include <linux/kref.h>
>> +#include <linux/mount.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> #include <linux/idr.h>
>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>> @@ -168,6 +169,16 @@ struct drm_device {
>> */
>> struct drm_master *master;
>> + /**
>> + * @huge_mnt:
>> + *
>> + * Huge tmpfs mountpoint used at GEM object initialization
>> + * drm_gem_object_init(). Drivers can call
>> drm_gem_huge_mnt_create() to
>> + * create a huge tmfps mountpoint. The default tmpfs mountpoint
>> + * (`shm_mnt`) is used if NULL.
>> + */
>> + struct vfsmount *huge_mnt;
>
> Maybe it would be nice to hide this in the !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> case? A bit ugly to add an ifdef but it is also a bit questionable to
> force the member on everyone.
It was initially stored in drivers' data structures but, as mentioned
above for v3, got put in drm_device to simplify call sites.
Both V3D and i915 are testing for that pointer in a few places and that
would require adding ifdefs there too. This would also be the same for
any drivers adding support for huge pages. Is that really worth it?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>> +
>> /**
>> * @driver_features: per-device driver features
>> *
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gem.h b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
>> index 7c8bd67d087c..7285a62d9afc 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_gem.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_gem.h
>> @@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object {
>> DRM_GEM_FOPS,\
>> }
>> +int drm_gem_huge_mnt_create(struct drm_device *dev, const char *value);
>> void drm_gem_object_release(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
>> void drm_gem_object_free(struct kref *kref);
>> int drm_gem_object_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists