[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251020142710.GA576827-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 09:27:10 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Charan Pedumuru <charan.pedumuru@...il.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Barker <paul.barker@...cloud.com>,
Marc Murphy <marc.murphy@...cloud.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] dt-bindings: mmc: ti,omap2430-sdhci: Add json
schema for the text binding
On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 01:04:36PM +0000, Charan Pedumuru wrote:
> Create a YAML binding for ti,omap2430-sdhci and fix vmmc-supply
> property typo for a DTS file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charan Pedumuru <charan.pedumuru@...il.com>
> ---
> Note: The property "ti,needs-special-reset" was not removed from DTS cause it will
> disrupt the compilation for other compatibles as the node &mmc is used for all
> compatibles for some DTS files.
I don't understand. AFIACT, "ti,needs-special-reset" is only used for
the hsmmc driver/binding. But this series for for the sdhci
driver/binding. So shouldn't the property be removed from sdhci nodes
(and the binding), but kept for hsmmc nodes?
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists