[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ad95fa5-6f1d-4c31-a6c6-41c1e9cc5c20@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:04:28 +0100
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>,
Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>, Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
fenghuay@...dia.com, baisheng.gao@...soc.com,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo
<guohanjun@...wei.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/29] arm_mpam: Allow configuration to be applied and
restored during cpu online
Hi James,
On 10/17/25 19:56, James Morse wrote:
> When CPUs come online the MSC's original configuration should be restored.
>
> Add struct mpam_config to hold the configuration. This has a bitmap of
> features that were modified. Once the maximum partid is known, allocate
> a configuration array for each component, and reprogram each RIS
> configuration from this.
>
> CC: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> * Call mpam_init_reset_cfg() on alloated config as 0 is not longer correct.
> * init_garbage() on each config - the array has to be freed in one go, but
> otherwise this looks weird.
> * Use struct initialiser in mpam_init_reset_cfg(),
> * Moved int err definition.
> * Removed srcu lock taking based on squinting at the only caller.
> * Moved config reset to mpam_reset_component_cfg() for re-use in
> mpam_reset_component_locked(), previous memset() was not enough since zero
> no longer means reset.
>
[...]
>
> +struct reprogram_ris {
> + struct mpam_msc_ris *ris;
> + struct mpam_config *cfg;
> +};
> +
> +/* Call with MSC lock held */
> +static int mpam_reprogram_ris(void *_arg)
> +{
> + u16 partid, partid_max;
> + struct reprogram_ris *arg = _arg;
> + struct mpam_msc_ris *ris = arg->ris;
> + struct mpam_config *cfg = arg->cfg;
> +
> + if (ris->in_reset_state)
> + return 0;
> +
> + spin_lock(&partid_max_lock);
> + partid_max = mpam_partid_max;
> + spin_unlock(&partid_max_lock);
> + for (partid = 0; partid <= partid_max + 1; partid++)
Loop overrun. This was correct in the previous version of the patch and
the same shape of loop is done correctly elsewhere in this version. I
think it would be good to standardise on using either:
partid <= partid_max
or
partid < partid_max + 1
I have a preference for the first as you don't need to think about the
size of the type.
--
Thanks,
Ben
Powered by blists - more mailing lists