[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPaS4c-AX0P66T30@shikoro>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 21:52:01 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Dmitry Guzman <dmitry.guzman@...ileye.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c: designware: Enable transfer with different
target addresses
> For your particular case, that will not help reaching the other segments as
> we wait for a STOP before changing the target address. So, it should not
> fail but do a write to segment 0 in your eeprom.
So, this patch replaces a repeated start with a stop + start
combination? Please don't do this. It will give users a false impression
that proper repeated start is supported. Honestly reporting that the HW
does not support is the better option, so the user can decide what to do
then.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists