[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4fd6596e4a646d7c3a19b4a8f398b970f27e8db.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 11:43:08 +0530
From: Shardul Bankar <shardulsb08@...il.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai
Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song
<yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP
Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo
<haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, open list
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/1] bpf: liveness: Handle ERR_PTR from
get_outer_instance() in propagate_to_outer_instance()
On Thu, 2025-10-16 at 10:43 -0700, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> We can land this change to avoid confusion, but the fixes tag is
> unnecessary.
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/8430f47f73d8d55a698e85341ece81955355c1fd.camel@gmail.com/
>
Thanks, Eduard, for the clarification and reference.
That makes sense — since update_instance() guarantees the outer
instance’s existence, this case wouldn’t be hit in normal execution.
I agree, the Fixes: tag can be dropped. The check mainly serves to make
the intent explicit and avoid future confusion.
I’ve resent the patch without the Fixes: tag.
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251020060712.4155702-1-shardulsb08@gmail.com/
Thanks again,
Shardul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists