[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12766136.O9o76ZdvQC@7950hx>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 16:30:12 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@...ux.dev>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, mattbobrowski@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, leon.hwang@...ux.dev,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 2/5] bpf: add kfunc bpf_tracing_is_exit for
TRACE_SESSION
On 2025/10/20 16:19, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 10:21:21PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
> > If TRACE_SESSION exists, we will use extra 8-bytes in the stack of the
> > trampoline to store the flags that we needed, and the 8-bytes lie before
> > the function argument count, which means ctx[-2]. And we will store the
> > flag "is_exit" to the first bit of it.
> >
> > Introduce the kfunc bpf_tracing_is_exit(), which is used to tell if it
> > is fexit currently.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@...natelecom.cn>
> > Co-developed-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
> > ---
> > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 ++++-
> > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > index 40e3274e8bc2..a1db11818d01 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > @@ -12284,6 +12284,7 @@ enum special_kfunc_type {
> > KF___bpf_trap,
> > KF_bpf_task_work_schedule_signal,
> > KF_bpf_task_work_schedule_resume,
> > + KF_bpf_tracing_is_exit,
> > };
> >
> > BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
> > @@ -12356,6 +12357,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore)
> > BTF_ID(func, __bpf_trap)
> > BTF_ID(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_signal)
> > BTF_ID(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_resume)
> > +BTF_ID(func, bpf_tracing_is_exit)
> >
> > static bool is_task_work_add_kfunc(u32 func_id)
> > {
> > @@ -12410,7 +12412,8 @@ get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> > struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno];
> > bool arg_mem_size = false;
> >
> > - if (meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx])
> > + if (meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx] ||
> > + meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_tracing_is_exit])
> > return KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CTX;
> >
> > /* In this function, we verify the kfunc's BTF as per the argument type,
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index 4f87c16d915a..6dde48b9d27f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > @@ -3356,12 +3356,49 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kprobe_multi_kfunc_set = {
> > .filter = bpf_kprobe_multi_filter,
> > };
> >
> > -static int __init bpf_kprobe_multi_kfuncs_init(void)
> > +__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
> > +
> > +__bpf_kfunc bool bpf_tracing_is_exit(void *ctx)
> > +{
> > + /* ctx[-2] is the session flags, and the last bit is is_exit */
> > + return ((u64 *)ctx)[-2] & 1;
> > +}
>
> I think this could be inlined by verifier
Yeah, that make sense. I'll inline it in the next version.
Thanks!
Menglong Dong
>
> jirka
>
>
> > +
> > +__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
>
> SNIP
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists