[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251020085231.GM6199@unreal>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 11:52:31 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] block-dma: properly take MMIO path
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 08:25:19AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 08:32:00AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> >
> > Make sure that CPU is not synced and IOMMU is configured to take
> > MMIO path by providing newly introduced DMA_ATTR_MMIO attribute.
>
> Please write a commit log that explains this. Where was DMA_ATTR_MMIO
> recently introduced? Why? What does this actually fix or improve?
What about this commit message?
Author: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Date: Mon Oct 13 18:34:12 2025 +0300
block-dma: properly take MMIO path
In commit eadaa8b255f3 ("dma-mapping: introduce new DMA attribute to
indicate MMIO memory"), DMA_ATTR_MMIO attribute was added to describe
MMIO addresses, which requite to avoid any memory cache flushing, as
an outcome of the discussion pointed in Link tag below.
In case of PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE transfer, blk-mq-dm logic
treated this as regular page and relied on "struct page" DMA flow.
That flow performs CPU cache flushing, which shouldn't be done here,
and doesn't set IOMMU_MMIO flag in DMA-IOMMU case.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/f912c446-1ae9-4390-9c11-00dce7bf0fd3@arm.com/
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists