lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qveta77u5ruaq4byjn32y3vj2s2nz6qvsgixg5w5ensxqsyjkj@nx4mgl7x7o6o>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 14:43:14 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>, 
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, 
	Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, 
	Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, Ben Copeland <benjamin.copeland@...aro.org>, 
	Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>, Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@...e.com>
Subject: Re: 6.18.0-rc1: LTP syscalls ioctl_pidfd05: TFAIL: ioctl(pidfd,
 PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid) expected EINVAL: ENOTTY (25)

On Fri 17-10-25 11:40:41, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > > ## Test error log
> > > tst_buffers.c:57: TINFO: Test is using guarded buffers
> > > tst_test.c:2021: TINFO: LTP version: 20250930
> > > tst_test.c:2024: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.18.0-rc1 #1 SMP PREEMPT
> > > @1760657272 aarch64
> > > tst_kconfig.c:88: TINFO: Parsing kernel config '/proc/config.gz'
> > > tst_kconfig.c:676: TINFO: CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS kernel option detected
> > > which might slow the execution
> > > tst_test.c:1842: TINFO: Overall timeout per run is 0h 21m 36s
> > > ioctl_pidfd05.c:45: TPASS: ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO, NULL) : EINVAL (22)
> > > ioctl_pidfd05.c:46: TFAIL: ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT,
> > > info_invalid) expected EINVAL: ENOTTY (25)
> 
> Looking closely this is a different problem.
> 
> What we do in the test is that we pass PIDFD_IOCTL_INFO whith invalid
> size with:
> 
> struct pidfd_info_invalid {
>         uint32_t dummy;
> };
> 
> #define PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT _IOWR(PIDFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 11, struct pidfd_info_invalid)
> 
> 
> And we expect to hit:
> 
>         if (usize < PIDFD_INFO_SIZE_VER0)
>                 return -EINVAL; /* First version, no smaller struct possible */
> 
> in fs/pidfs.c
> 
> 
> And apparently the return value was changed in:
> 
> commit 3c17001b21b9f168c957ced9384abe969019b609
> Author: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> Date:   Fri Sep 12 13:52:24 2025 +0200
> 
>     pidfs: validate extensible ioctls
>     
>     Validate extensible ioctls stricter than we do now.
>     
>     Reviewed-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
>     Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>     Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/pidfs.c b/fs/pidfs.c
> index edc35522d75c..0a5083b9cce5 100644
> --- a/fs/pidfs.c
> +++ b/fs/pidfs.c
> @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ static bool pidfs_ioctl_valid(unsigned int cmd)
>                  * erronously mistook the file descriptor for a pidfd.
>                  * This is not perfect but will catch most cases.
>                  */
> -               return (_IOC_TYPE(cmd) == _IOC_TYPE(PIDFD_GET_INFO));
> +               return extensible_ioctl_valid(cmd, PIDFD_GET_INFO, PIDFD_INFO_SIZE_VER0);
>         }
>  
>         return false;
> 
> 
> So kernel has changed error it returns, if this is a regression or not
> is for kernel developers to decide.

Yes, it's mostly a question to Christian whether if passed size for
extensible ioctl is smaller than minimal, we should be returning
ENOIOCTLCMD or EINVAL. I think EINVAL would make more sense but Christian
is our "extensible ioctl expert" :).

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ